Re: UUID

From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-07-29 05:30:09

On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 07:27, Ming Cheng via Boost-users <
boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:

Now let's focus on 64-bit UUID.
>

There is no such thing.

Can do by boost?
>

Therefore no.

As I mentioned before, let me hold responsible for mis-usage. you
> experience people just help.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Boost-users <boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of
> Gavin Lambert via Boost-users <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 29, 2021 3:07 AM
> *To:* boost-users_at_[hidden] <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
> *Cc:* Gavin Lambert <boost_at_[hidden]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Boost-users] UUID
>
> On 29/07/2021 9:16 am, chengm349 wrote:
> > so boost uuid can't support compromised uuid needs?
>
> Don't make something look like a uuid if it's not actually a uuid.  That
> road leads to pain and torment.
>
> Go back to the customer and clarify the requirement, it's likely they
> can be persuaded to do things better.
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
-- 
Richard Hodges
hodges.r_at_[hidden]
office: [phone]
home: [phone]
mobile: [phone]