Subject: [ggl] Header inclusion guards
From: Barend Gehrels (Barend.Gehrels)
Date: 2009-04-18 07:19:37
>> Then, after GGL will be merged with Boost, it will be simple to
>> update include paths by search "<ggl" and replace with "<boost/ggl"
>> Is that OK? Are we ready to plan such update?
One thing more about this: the namespace. Should it be changed as well?
This will have (even) more influence on everything (including on users,
though they can alias).
I think we can leave it just "geometry::", it is not necessary to say
"ggl::", meaning "generic geometry library::", in each phrase. On the
other hand: it is mpl:: and gil::. The BGL (boost graph library) does
not live in a namespace and is in the folder "boost/graph". There is
probably no uniform convention about this. But most namespaces are named
the same as their folders.
What is your opinion? Bruno?
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net