Boost logo

Geometry :

Subject: [ggl] Header inclusion guards
From: Barend Gehrels (Barend.Gehrels)
Date: 2009-04-18 07:19:37

>> Then, after GGL will be merged with Boost, it will be simple to
>> update include paths by search "<ggl" and replace with "<boost/ggl"
>> Is that OK? Are we ready to plan such update?
One thing more about this: the namespace. Should it be changed as well?
This will have (even) more influence on everything (including on users,
though they can alias).

I think we can leave it just "geometry::", it is not necessary to say
"ggl::", meaning "generic geometry library::", in each phrase. On the
other hand: it is mpl:: and gil::. The BGL (boost graph library) does
not live in a namespace and is in the folder "boost/graph". There is
probably no uniform convention about this. But most namespaces are named
the same as their folders.

What is your opinion? Bruno?

Regards, Barend

Geometry list run by mateusz at