Subject: [ggl] inline keyword in class definition
From: Barend (barend)
Date: 2009-05-10 16:18:56
> Barend, I guess your test consisted in removing *all* the inline
> keywords, be they on free functions or member functions, right?
Again, good point. Re-adding them on the free "area" and "loop"
functions gives indeed the same result, i.e. hardly measurable. So
inline can go for 3.4.4 as well, on member-functions. However, not
knowing every compiler, I still favour to keep them, the don't do harm.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net