Subject: [ggl] [doc] Index template parameters for get/set accessors?
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande)
Date: 2010-03-10 04:07:30
> But do you really generate a page per function overload? For this specific
> situation, I agree. However, for e.g. the area algorithm, having two
> overloads, one with a strategy and one without, is it not cleaner to present
> them together? Or "intersection" and "intersection_inserter"? Or the
> overloads in different namespaces which we will get?
Indeed, the STL usually presents this kind of overloads in the same page.
So I guess it would be less confusing to users to do that as well, if
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net