Subject: [ggl] Re: [doc] Index template parameters for get/set accessors?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz)
Date: 2010-03-12 08:47:32
Bruno Lalande wrote:
>> But do you really generate a page per function overload? For this
>> situation, I agree. However, for e.g. the area algorithm, having two
>> overloads, one with a strategy and one without, is it not cleaner to
>> them together? Or "intersection" and "intersection_inserter"? Or the
>> overloads in different namespaces which we will get?
> Indeed, the STL usually presents this kind of overloads in the same page.
> So I guess it would be less confusing to users to do that as well, if
> it's possible.
I think it will work in pretty much similar way.
Let me to prepare a new draft, then it will be more clear.
-- Mateusz Loskot http://mateusz.loskot.net -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/doc-Index-template-parameters-for-get-set-accessors-tp434689p443957.html Sent from the Boost Geometry mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net