Subject: [ggl] Re: rtree ?
From: Bernhard (Bernhard.Schmitz)
Date: 2011-11-26 00:00:30
Adam Wulkiewicz wrote
> Of course, I'm planning to do it. But first, I'd like to hear from you
> all, do you like the interface? Maby something should be added or changed?
I have now noticed a strange effect: If I base my box geometries on
model::point<double, 2, cartesian> everything works. However, if I use
model::d2::point_xy<double, cartesian>, I get a series of compilation
errors. It took me quite a time to figure this out, as I had thought those
to be equivalent (other than the convenience functions) and used the latter,
and with everything except the rtree they work indiscriminately.
-- View this message in context: http://boost-geometry.203548.n3.nabble.com/rtree-tp3437687p3536528.html Sent from the Boost Geometry mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net