Subject: Re: [geometry] [Spatial Index] bug & question
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-19 13:18:45
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 15:45, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>> If reverse() adaptor is not feasible, then rwithin, rcovered_by? ;)
>> Ok, but the ones proposed by TONGARI would probably be more intuitive. Don't
>> you think? I.e. bgi::contains() and bgi::covers().
> Yes, I agree that is better, but point is, the 'reverse' thing is confusing,
> we mean 'converse', don't we?
Yes, your're right. I was looking for a better word ;)
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net