|
Geometry : |
Subject: Re: [geometry] Andoyer geographic distance
From: Adam Wulkiewicz (adam.wulkiewicz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-11 18:49:55
Hi,
2014-11-11 1:53 GMT+01:00 Branimir Betov <bbetov_at_[hidden]>:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to work with boost 1.57 and also I've got the
> geometry.extensions.gis from the develop branch. I am using geographic cs.
> Looking at extensions\gis\geographic\strategies\andoyer.hpp I think there
> is a problem with one of the constructors:
>
> explicit inline andoyer(RadiusType f)
> : m_ellipsoid(f)
> {}
>
> I think should be:
>
> explicit inline andoyer(RadiusType f)
> : m_ellipsoid(f*, f*)
> {}
>
> (note the second radius passed to m_ellipsoid). Otherwise it chooses the
> incorrect constructor for the ellipsoid and distances are incorrect.
>
>
I'm not entirely sure what's the purpose of this ctor and one-argument ctor
of ellipsoid. I'd say that the intention was to create a "unit" ellipsoid
with radius=1 and flattening f, but there is an error in the ellipsoid ctor
(it doesn't set B, only A and F). There is a reference to a unit sphere
(not ellipsoid) in the comment:
// Unit sphere ellipsoid(T const& f) : m_a(1.0) , m_f(f) {}
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/blob/develop/include/boost/geometry/extensions/gis/geographic/detail/ellipsoid.hpp
I plan to clean this code and move from extensions in the near future. I
think that this ctor could just dissapear. In the meanwhile I may just fix
it by setting B properly.
> Sorry for posting it in the groups - I am not sure what the proper way to
> submit a patch is.
>
>
This group is a right place for such discussion :)
A patch could be sent to this group or proposed directly on GitHub. I
personally prefer the latter. Here is a tutorial:
https://github.com/boostorg/geometry/wiki/Contribution-Tutorial
Regards,
Adam
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net