Subject: Re: [ublas] CI setup
From: Cem Bassoy (cem.bassoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-29 19:36:21
thanks Stefan. I somehow cannot push local commits to the remote. Are we
supposed to fork from GSOC/UBLAS ?
Stefan, do we agree on my project proposal?
If yes, I would like to start designing the tensor and helper template
I would choose the rank/order (number of dimensions), the dimensions and
the layout to be runtime variables.
So the only two template parameters would be data type and the storage
array type (unbounded/bounded array).
Stefan Seefeld via ublas <ublas_at_[hidden]> schrieb am Fr., 27. Apr.
> Hi all,
> as we have three students working on Boost.uBLAS projects this summer, I
> think it would be useful to have some CI coverage to allow new code to be
> tested across platforms.
> I'm thus going to set up some basic CI coverage (Travis-CI and AppVeyor)
> over the next couple of days. Once that's done, all the GSoC repos can
> rebase onto that and do whatever else is needed to use these services. I'll
> send a note once it's ready.
> [image: Stefan]
> ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
> ublas mailing list
> Sent to: cem.bassoy_at_[hidden]