Subject: Re: [ublas] CI setup
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-30 08:03:48
Yes try to fork from https://github.com/uBLAS/ublas
We have our own repository for ublas development.
Silly questions: can we have right from the beginning a fixed dimensions
tensors on top of the regular tensor ?
I'm not sure my questions is relevant in the tensor world, but what I mean
is, if we can either have the rank/order,etc... as a template parameter we
can maybe benefit from extra optimization from the compiler ?
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Cem Bassoy via ublas <ublas_at_[hidden]
> thanks Stefan. I somehow cannot push local commits to the remote. Are we
> supposed to fork from GSOC/UBLAS ?
> Stefan, do we agree on my project proposal?
> If yes, I would like to start designing the tensor and helper template
> I would choose the rank/order (number of dimensions), the dimensions and
> the layout to be runtime variables.
> So the only two template parameters would be data type and the storage
> array type (unbounded/bounded array).
> Stefan Seefeld via ublas <ublas_at_[hidden]> schrieb am Fr., 27. Apr.
> 2018, 16:25:
>> Hi all,
>> as we have three students working on Boost.uBLAS projects this summer, I
>> think it would be useful to have some CI coverage to allow new code to be
>> tested across platforms.
>> I'm thus going to set up some basic CI coverage (Travis-CI and AppVeyor)
>> over the next couple of days. Once that's done, all the GSoC repos can
>> rebase onto that and do whatever else is needed to use these services. I'll
>> send a note once it's ready.
>> [image: Stefan]
>> ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
>> ublas mailing list
>> Sent to: cem.bassoy_at_[hidden]
> ublas mailing list
> Sent to: david.bellot_at_[hidden]