Subject: Re: [ublas] CI setup
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-04-29 19:48:47
On 2018-04-29 03:36 PM, Cem Bassoy via ublas wrote:
> thanks Stefan. I somehow cannot push local commits to the remote. Are
> we supposed to fork from GSOC/UBLAS ?
That would be redundant. I think you should push directly into the GSoC
repo, and if you don't have write permission that's a bug we need to
fix. (I don't have the admin rights to that repo to fix this myself. I
suspect David can help with that, though.)
> Stefan, do we agree on my project proposal?
> If yes, I would like to start designing the tensor and helper template
> I would choose the rank/order (number of dimensions), the dimensions
> and the layout to be runtime variables.
> So the only two template parameters would be data type and the storage
> array type (unbounded/bounded array).
The point that still needs elaboration is the relationship between the
new and the existing code. You mentioned some possible refactoring that
would make integration easier. Can you please outline what refactoring
you have in mind ? We can then discuss the right timeframe to work on
the refactoring PRs, and decide whether it's indeed best to work on your
tensor code as something mostly independent of the existing ublas
codebase or not.
As I mentioned, I'd still much favour the work being done in-tree rather
than out-of-tree, but I'm ready to be convinced that that's not a good idea.
-- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...