From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-31 14:20:20
That's a good idea. I'll give it a try.
It could solve the problem of the Standard Library, too. The Standard
Library could (optionally) be shown to a depth of 1.
Jeremy Siek wrote:
>I agree that dependencies tables/diagrams are useful.
>It was helpful to see the complete list of directly and indirectly
>included headers for a particular file, however it is also important to
>see the whole graph... not just the "flattened" version. Would
>it be possible to output the header dependencies in some sort
>of hierarchical view that shows this information? Perhaps
>just run BFS over the graph and output the resulting tree
>Just add an indenting level for the distance the node is from
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk