Re: Is header dependency table useful?

From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-01 09:20:42

Jeremy -

> Doxygen isn't picking up the indirect includes, and so 
>  gives a less useful view, IMO.  I don't know if it has 
>  an indirect include 
>  option.

The problem isn't indirect includes, it is a macro expansion issue.  
My Doxygen options were not set to expand macros, so all the 
includes in regex.hpp under the #ifdef __cplusplus were not 
picked up.  I have rerun it and it works fine, but I have to 
go to work now so I won't be able to post the change till 
later :-(

Jeff