|
Boost : |
From: joel de guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-26 15:55:16
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" :
> From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> > BTW, isn't "identity" a much better name than "type2type"?
>
> Identity sounds great, I'll make that change unless there is a lot of
> opposition.
>
identity is cool!
int2type and type2type are quite, umm, unclear.
How about static_int<N> instead of int2type<N> ? Syntactically, It's like
static_cast that transforms an int to a distinct static-integer type.
Or maybe, how about: int_identity<N> ?
2c worth :-)
--Joel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk