From: David A. Greene (greened_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-11-26 16:35:41
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>int2type and type2type are quite, umm, unclear.
>>How about static_int<N> instead of int2type<N> ?
>>Syntactically, It's like static_cast that transforms
>>an int to a distinct static-integer type.
>>Or maybe, how about: int_identity<N> ?
> The similar template in boost::mpl is called 'int_t<N>'. There are also
> 'bool_t<C>' and 'fixed_t<N,M>', if it helps to see the pattern.
'int_t<N>' looks to me like one is defining an integer type with
a specific bit width, not mapping an integer to a type. I got
very confused after reading Joel's message and your followup.
-- "Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music, and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk