Re: [boost] address_of implementation

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-04-10 23:12:37

On Wednesday 10 April 2002 10:03 pm, you wrote:
> on 4/9/02 11:43 PM, Douglas Gregor at gregod_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > 'tis done. addressof() has been added as boost/utility/addressof.hpp
> > (also included in boost/utility.hpp), along with documentation and some
> > testcases.
>
> Should the function template and header be "address_of" instead of
> "addressof", to separate the words?

We chose addressof to fit with sizeof, offsetof, and the common extensions 
alignof and typeof.

        Doug