From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-20 14:58:22
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] type<>
> From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]>
> > I believe a class template that "returns" the type of its argument
> > called 'identity' :). If it doesn't "return" anything and is just a
> > envelope" (the purpose of current 'boost::type<>'), then IMO it's a
> > template.
> Actually, identity<> is also a fine name for a type envelope: it's used to
> transmit the identity of a type, its parameter... and I'd rather have just
> one template than two.
> However, I know there was what seemed like rancorous objection when I
> suggested identity<> before; nobody seemed to get the whole metafunction
> idea, so for the record, I don't care all that much what we call it.
FWIW, I think that identity<> is a good name, and I agree with David that
just providing the metafunction is enough... if you don't 'call it' (access
::type); it's just a type envelope.
Since you *need* to change it, I think it would be reasonable if you just do
it if nobody complains in the next few days.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk