From: Joel de Guzman (djowel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-20 12:18:33
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>>Actually, identity<> is also a fine name for a type envelope: it's
>>transmit the identity of a type, its parameter... and I'd rather have
>>one template than two.
>>However, I know there was what seemed like rancorous objection when I
>>suggested identity<> before; nobody seemed to get the whole metafunction
>>idea, so for the record, I don't care all that much what we call it.
>FWIW, I think that identity<> is a good name, and I agree with David that
>just providing the metafunction is enough... if you don't 'call it'
>::type); it's just a type envelope.
>Since you *need* to change it, I think it would be reasonable if you
>it if nobody complains in the next few days.
identity is a nice name. However, the name itself does not imply
that it is a metafunction. I know it would be longish but I feel
that type_identity would be better (it's just 1 char longer than
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk