From: Glen Knowles (gknowles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-22 21:18:25
Yes, that is how we use boost in our projects, but perhaps that isn't
relevant to how files within boost refer to each other? Now that I've
thought about it a little more I'm starting to think that it does make sense
for boost files to include other boost files using the "" syntax.
From: David B. Held [mailto:dheld_at_[hidden]]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 5:50 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: #include <boost/...> to #include "boost/..."
"Bohdan" <warever_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I do not know whether standart has something about precompiled
> most probably not. Anyway i wish to include boost headers in <...> for
Well, if it comes down to a vote, I would prefer <> myself, and that is how
I include Boost headers currently.
Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk