From: Alex Besogonov (cyberax_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-01-15 12:32:26
Edward Diener wrote:
> I would be careful using FastDelegate as an adjunct to Boost
> function/bind. It is very dependent on knowledge of compiler member
> function pointer sizes and uses "hacks" based on that knowledge to
> achieve its speed. Boost should try to stay clear of low-level compiler
> dependent knowledge whenever it can, sacrificing a little extra speed
> for greater stability.
Boost already has a lots of compiler-specific hacks and kludges (see MPL
or TYPEOF/FOREACH). There's nothing inherently wrong in a good hack if
it is protected by #ifdef's and there's a fallback implementation for
> Of course if it is an optional choice for
> end-users, then it is more understandable but even then end-users should
> be duly notified of the issues involved. This is not in any way a
> putdown of FastDelegate but Boost function/bind is richer in
> functionality and therefore pays the price of being slower. Of course
> speed is important but not if it means less stability of implementation.
SBO already gives 10x speed boost to Boost.bind :) It's performance is
quite acceptable now.
-- With respect, Alex Besogonov (cyberax_at_[hidden])
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk