From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-01 04:56:08
Gennaro Prota wrote:
> despite proceeding on it by fits and starts I've completed the work on
> the new compiler identification macros. Since Rene asked for them to
> be committed after the 1.34 release they are still on hold
> (/auto-censorship here/) however I'd like to add tests for the new
> BOOST_WORKAROUND macro. The question is: it was, and is, a sort of
> private tool for boost developers, as its placement in the detail/
> subdirectory emphasizes, so we probably (uncertainty and doubt) don't
> want its test results to show in the regression reports. If so, where
> should those tests go?
I don't know, but we should have some - possibly minimal - docs for this new
BOOST_WORKAROUND too. You're welcome to put everything under libs/config,
but I've no idea if that's the best place.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk