Re: [boost] [config] C++0x macros

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-27 08:36:45

Beman Dawes wrote:
> There is a practical limit on the length of names because the config
> mechanism uses them for file names. But perhaps we can make them less
> cryptic, and still hold them to a reasonable length, say 32
> characters.

It's not absolutely essential for the test filenames to have the same name 
as the macro - as long as you can find one from the other :-)

Personally I'd go for more descriptive names as well,

HTH, John.