Subject: Re: [boost] ATTN: Beman / Eric (was Re: [1.37] status/Jamfile.v2)
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-20 05:07:30
Nicola Musatti wrote:
>>> What makes you say that? The tests on the release branch have been
>>> running successfully.
>> I'm not sure where the difference is between how the official
>> regression tests are run and how local testing is performed. If I
>> run bjam from the boost/status directory in a sandbox checked out
>> from branches/release with a command line as the following:
>> bjam -a --v2 --dump-tests toolset=borland-6.1.0
>> The tests for the libraries I listed below aren't run.
Hmm, just tried:
bjam -n -a --dump-tests toolset=borland
and the libs you list do have their tests run (which doesn't mean we
shouldn't merge status/Jamfile.v2 changes of course, the question is whether
to do it now). Also those libs do have their test results showing up in the
Confused yours, John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk