Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-30 05:52:56

Jan Stetka wrote:
> I'm don't known what "move semantics" are, my motive is so I can have 
> named_mutex and managed_shared_memory in the global scope without having 
> to instantiate as pointers.

In other words, you want to create a default-constructed type and then 
swap it with a named constructed one when you have enough data to build 
a named object?

I will add default-constructors to my to-do list.

Regards,

Ion