Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: Jan Stetka (janpstetka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-30 06:11:17
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> Jan Stetka wrote:
>> I'm don't known what "move semantics" are, my motive is so I can have
>> named_mutex and managed_shared_memory in the global scope without
>> having to instantiate as pointers.
> In other words, you want to create a default-constructed type and then
> swap it with a named constructed one when you have enough data to build
> a named object?
> I will add default-constructors to my to-do list.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Does the shared memory get destroyed when theses types go out of scope
or am I safe with local instances, if so I don't need the default
constructors. You've designed the library so well that it is showing
problems in my coding style :-)