Subject: Re: [boost] [function] Using boost::function when rtti isnot available
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-27 03:49:27
"David Genest" <david.genest_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Domagoj Saric Wrote:
>> it has various other space and time optimizations besides no-typeid
>> support as
>> well as cofigurability through policies (although it seemes to have
>> little interest)...
> I read most of the thread and I'm surprised to see that you are right
> regarding interest. I'm surely interested which means there must be
> others. I'm impressed by the depth of your analysis/optimisations.
> Will this effort be brought in a new version of boost soon ?
sorry...i cannot know that ;)
there seem to be several more 'higher-level' discussion threads active at the
moment...perhaps 'resurrecting' the topic at a more peaceful time would be a
>> hope it helps...:
> It will!
glad to hear that ;)
> I didn't find any attachments in gmane, but found the vault version
> http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=new_function_implementation_proposal.tgz&directory=Function%20Objects& )
> Is this the latest version ?
pretty much...i paused the work on bf until there is atleast some discussion on
the work so far (what's 'good' and what's 'bad') and any 'semi-official' hints
that the changes/ideas might eventually be accepted...
>Can I just apply the new files over the current function directory?
yes...it should be a drop in replacement...
-- "That men do not learn very much from the lessons of history is the most important of all the lessons of history." Aldous Huxley
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk