Re: [boost] Low discrepancy sequences (Boost.Random)

Subject: Re: [boost] Low discrepancy sequences (Boost.Random)
From: Justinas V. D. (jvd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-30 14:37:10

2010.03.29 18:59, Steven Watanabe rašė:
 > [skipped]
> I didn't look at it very closely, but I have a few notes:
> * bit_count. This appears to be equivalent to std::numeric_limits::digits?
> * validation is eventually going to die, since it isn't in the standard.
> It will be moved to the tests, since that's the only place that it is used.
> * I'm not sure that the extra constructor/seed overloads are a good idea.
> (Yes, I know I asked for it, but it seems to expose the implementation
> details, and
> I don't think it's all that useful without a corresponding way to get
> the state. The
> rationale that you gave for only having the default constructor seems
> reasonable.)
>

The interface has settled down and it even looks fine, i.e., I am 
finally happy with it. Many thanks to you, your comments were 
enormously useful. The last version is uploaded to Vault. (No doxygen 
comments yet.)

>>>>>
>>>>> Would you be willing to write documentation for this as well?

I have written the concept part.

J.