Subject: Re: [boost] [trac] svn.boost.org slow (was: Boost bug sprint?)
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-17 18:00:53
On Nov 17, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 3:58 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>> On 1:59 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> It was kinda a loaded question on my part :-) But I didn't want to
>>> bias your response by telling you ahead of time that I did work on it
>>> over the weekend & Monday. And did some minor changes that sped things
>>> up somewhat. Still looking for other things to do.
>> I still see load averages in the 12-16 range, which seems high. Is that
>> a concern?
>> Seems like it's caching or something: response times seem pretty uneven.
>> (Aren't I the typical user? Even if it did my laundry and read my mind,
>> I'd still stay, "yeah, but look at what it's still not doing!")
>> But it does seem significantly better! Thanks!
> Having just executed a couple of queries and modified some trac tickets,
> I can say that trac is still really slow. One of the queries even timed
> out waiting for svn.boost.org to respond. I'd say there's still a
> problem. Rene, anything you could do would be hugely appreciated. I'm
> talking BIG karma in the afterlife. :-)
What's the hardware underneath svn.boost.org?
What else is that hardware doing?
Can we upgrade the hw or move stuff off that box?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk