|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [trac] svn.boost.org slow (was: Boost bug sprint?)
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-17 18:00:53
On Nov 17, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 3:58 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>> On 1:59 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> It was kinda a loaded question on my part :-) But I didn't want to
>>> bias your response by telling you ahead of time that I did work on it
>>> over the weekend & Monday. And did some minor changes that sped things
>>> up somewhat. Still looking for other things to do.
>>
>> I still see load averages in the 12-16 range, which seems high. Is that
>> a concern?
>>
>> Seems like it's caching or something: response times seem pretty uneven.
>> (Aren't I the typical user? Even if it did my laundry and read my mind,
>> I'd still stay, "yeah, but look at what it's still not doing!")
>>
>> But it does seem significantly better! Thanks!
>
> Having just executed a couple of queries and modified some trac tickets,
> I can say that trac is still really slow. One of the queries even timed
> out waiting for svn.boost.org to respond. I'd say there's still a
> problem. Rene, anything you could do would be hugely appreciated. I'm
> talking BIG karma in the afterlife. :-)
What's the hardware underneath svn.boost.org?
What else is that hardware doing?
Can we upgrade the hw or move stuff off that box?
-- Marshall
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk