Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] Boost.Log: Any Comments? (Was: [log] Permission to merge to trunk)
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-28 11:46:09

On 23.03.2013 02:04, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On Friday 22 March 2013 20:17:06 Daniel James wrote:
>> On 22 March 2013 18:56, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On Friday 22 March 2013 13:50:53 Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>> You never need permission to merge to trunk. Unless you are asking the
>>>> author of the library. And then just ask the author directly.
>>> I'm the author. But ok, I thought I needed a permission. Thank you.
>> You do need to meet the conditions set in the review. So I think you
>> need the review manager's approval.
> Vladimir, could you give your permission for Boost.Log inclusion into Boost?
> For your convenience I'm re-posting a few essential links:
> Review result:
> My post with the actions taken on the issues in the review result:
> Library docs:
> Library code:
> svn co


thanks for asking. I am not sure I am much qualified to decide on my own. I see there was some
discussion but it does not seem like many people commented. So how about this:

- Anybody who participated in Boost.Log discussion, or want to use it, or use it, please speak up.

- I will also take a look, w.r.t review results and your list of changes. I am travelling now,
   so won't be able to do this util start of next week.

- If we don't any objects mid next week, Boost.Log goes (into trunk).

There's additional checklist for it to go to release branch -- which you presumably want --
but that's the next step, and the schedule for the next release is somewhat in the air.


Vladimir Prus
CodeSourcery / Mentor Graphics

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at