Subject: Re: [boost] VC2013 1.55 beta failures
From: Marcel Raad (raad_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-23 14:34:58
Peter Dimov <lists <at> pdimov.com> writes:
> Get signals2 working, I'd say. The variadic constructor is already a bit
> broken in that it incorrectly accepts zero arguments, so why not just
> constrain it to two or more.
Yes, working around the template function resolution failures in the boost
code path with variadic templates should be easier than working around the
compiler crashes in the code path without them. In the libraries that I am
using, the signals2::slot constructor issue is the only compile error in
the code path with variadic templates enabled.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk