Subject: Re: [boost] [math] Contribution and TODO-list implementation.
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-01 08:12:31
> In addition to John's detailed responses... I've got a few ideas for
> Boost.Math that might be acceptable for the scope of
> your project. I would be interested in looking into new functions such as
> those related to the Lerch transcendental
> (Zeta, Hurwitz Zeta, Polygamma for wider argument range, etc.).
To add to those are the hypergeometric functions 1F1 and 2F1, note however
that these are not only hard to implement well, but they are practically
untestable (too many arguments). Unfortunately they are also very useful!
A good research project though...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk