Subject: Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-06 14:33:53
On 4 January 2014 11:34, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Also, more controversial features, techniques or ideas which wouldn't
> pass peer review are deliberately kept till after admission.
Do you have an example of this? IMHO, this seems like it would be an abuse
of the trust given to Boost developers.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk