Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-06 14:33:53

On 4 January 2014 11:34, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Also, more controversial features, techniques or ideas which wouldn't
> pass peer review are deliberately kept till after admission.
>

Do you have an example of this?  IMHO, this seems like it would be an abuse
of the trust given to Boost developers.
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]