Subject: Re: [boost] Once accepted, when does a library undergo further review?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-07 05:10:39
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:33 PM, Nevin Liber <nevin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 4 January 2014 11:34, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Also, more controversial features, techniques or ideas which wouldn't pass peer review are deliberately kept till after admission.
> Do you have an example of this?
I can only suppose that AFIO will be such a library if it should pass review some day, and that makes me uncomfortable.
> IMHO, this seems like it would be an abuse of the trust given to Boost developers.
Thanks, Nevin. I was planning a similar reply.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk