Subject: Re: [boost] [mpl] multiset
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-13 06:19:07
On 11/02/2015 01:25, Bruno Dutra wrote:
> Anyways, MPL seems to have seen better days of activity back in the day,
> there's lots of opportunities for improvement still and I for one would be
> glad to help developing some fancier features.
MPL is not undergoing active development anymore and is just being
I believe however that some people were interested in doing a new C++11
version of MPL. I think the problem is that every year or so someone
finds a new fancy way to do meta-programming with the latest C++
features, with noble goals of unifying MPL and Fusion, so most of these
rewrites end up as experiments rather than stable libraries.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk