Subject: Re: [boost] Merged #149, "Encode architecture and address model in versioned layout names"
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-16 09:40:04
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost
>> I've just merged https://github.com/boostorg/boost/pull/149, "Encode
>> architecture and address model in versioned layout names", into the develop
>> branch. Let's see how this goes.
>> Welcome to 2005. :-)
> Now that building Boost with address-model=32,64 works, I think that we
> ought to build both for --build-type=complete on Windows. I'm less sure
> about --build-type=minimal, but given that (a) what minimal builds is
> determined by the configuration Visual Studio projects use by default (which
> is 32 bit) and (b) that we're getting more and more calls for 64 being built
> by default, it looks like --build-type=minimal ought to build both 32 and 64
> as well.
> that we're getting more and more calls for 64 being built
> by default,
By default, does that mean with or without --build-type=complete specified?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk