Subject: Re: [boost] Merged #149, "Encode architecture and address model in versioned layout names"
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-16 12:04:09
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Now that building Boost with address-model=32,64 works, I think that we
> > ought to build both for --build-type=complete on Windows. I'm less sure
> > about --build-type=minimal, but given that (a) what minimal builds is
> > determined by the configuration Visual Studio projects use by default
> > (which is 32 bit) and (b) that we're getting more and more calls for 64
> > being built by default, it looks like --build-type=minimal ought to
> > build both 32 and 64 as well.
> > that we're getting more and more calls for 64 being built by default,
> By default, does that mean with or without --build-type=complete
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk