RE: [Boost-Users] HP, aCC and the standards

From: Tom Matelich (tmatelich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-04 11:18:23

Who is running those tests, and what version of aCC is that?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toon Knapen [mailto:toon.knapen_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 12:15 AM
> To: Boost-Users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-Users] HP, aCC and the standards
> 
> 
> On Monday 03 February 2003 18:06, Tom Matelich wrote:
> > I would recommend contacting the aCC support people.  They 
> are generally
> > quite reasonable.  In fact, the hp status tables (which 
> appear a bit out of
> > date) at http://www.boost.org/status/cs-hpux.html are run 
> remotely on a box
> > provided by HP for boost to use. 
> 
> For an updated status-page, check out :
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
> and you see that aCC has the highest failure rate !
> I also recently talked to an HP representative and he was 
> under the impression 
> that aCC was very confirming.
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
> ---------------------~-->
> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/LIgTpC/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/EbFolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
> 
> Info: <http://www.boost.org>
> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl>
> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:  Information contained in this message and/or
attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc.
If you have received this transmission in error, please notify
the sender by return email.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------