Subject: [ggl] namespace renaming
From: Bruno Lalande (bruno.lalande)
Date: 2009-12-03 07:32:53
> So I propose namespace shape for the neutrally-named collection of shapes.
> We then get:
> boost::geometry::shape::point<...> // as we have it now in boost::geometry
> boost::geometry::shape::polygon<...> // as we have it now in
It's better than "geometry" indeed. However maybe an even better name
would be "model", since those geometries model the concepts GGL
defines. It would state more clearly that those shapes are not mere
shapes but are also examples of models for our concepts.
Geometry list run by mateusz at loskot.net