Subject: Re: [boost] Slow Bugs Tracker
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-11 10:49:29
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Lars Viklund <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:30:13AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> Trac, the bugs tracker used, is really slow. Using it is a bad
>>> experience, every single time.
>> There's nothing particularly wrong with Trac per se as I understand it.
> I've never seen a fast Trac instance.
>> It's more a matter of the resources available on the Boost servers vs.
>> the very high load placed on them.
> What resources are available and what kind of load is there?
>>> Would it be possible to use a better bugs tracker?
>> Changing the bug tracker would break every single link made to it in the
>> wild, not to mention that migrating data from one tracker brand to
>> another brand is costly and non-trivial.
> True. One option might be to continue using the old one for existing bugs.
> Another option is to setup a forwarder to forward from the old to the
> new tracker to avoid broken links.
>> Any suggestion to migrate to another system (may it be build system,
>> version control system, bug tracking system), should have some
>> rudimentary measurements of the costs involved and the likely benefits
>> that would come out of it.
> I assume we agree on the performance problems of the current tracker, right?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk